Sunday, 22 March 2009

NEXT POST
Ideologia Ideologically, UPyD is not defined as left or right. They say at the beginning of its founding manifesto We start with a revolutionary assumption: that people are born and not left or right or any card game in diapers. Let further, at the risk of shock to the timorous believe the citizens capable of thinking for themselves and to choose accordingly, according to the bids of the parties and their experience of the historical situation which we live. Therefore Kabbalah we do not believe that nobody is obliged to vote the same thing or resign themselves to the policy options in place, and when you have been disappointed before. Be considered left or right we do not think the core of the problem, but we pity those who lacked sincere best arguments to discredit the adversary. Continuing with his manifesto: To avoid this false dilemma, we prefer to speak of progress instead of left or right. Being progressive is to fight the tyranny that trample formal democracy, and against poverty and ignorance that democracy impossible material. Andneither the current nor the parties of the left-right have a monopoly of enlightenment, but both traditions have contributed to the policy. We'd like to be able to harness the positive elements of each other, but without having to carry their prejudices and reactionary remnants that exist in both camps. As noted UPyD prefers to define itself as a progressive party, other beyond ideological labels. The match is part of what has been called a few times cross is a cross-party, a party that seeks to encompass both concepts and ideas of political priorities, to work together for the principles of the party and the progress of society. According to his spokesman said in an interview Rosa Diez, Training is progressive and cross, which...
PREVIOUS POST
Unintended consequences Gorbachev's efforts to reinvigorate the Communist system, although promising, eventually proving to beuncontrollable and caused a cascade of events that ultimately end with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Initially sought as a means to sustain the Soviet economy, the policies of perestroika and glasnost soon led to unintended consequences. The relaxation brought glasnost led to the Communist Party lost its dominance over the media. In a short time, and to cock Enza of the authorities, the media began to expose severe social and economic problems that the Soviet government had long denied, and even actively concealed. Among those who raised the most attention included poor housing, alcoholism, drug abuse, pollution, outdated factories of the era of Stalin and the corruption of small to large scale. All these problems University of Southern California had not been in the discourse of the official media for decades. The media reports also exposed crimes committed by the Stalin and the Soviet regime, the gulags, the treaty with Adolf Hitler and the Great Purge. Furthermore, the ongoing war in Afghanistan, and the mishandling of the disaster at Chernobyl in 1986 damaged the credibility of the government. Overall, the positive view of Soviet life which had been presented to the public for decades during the official media was being rapidly dismantled, and the negative aspects of life in the Soviet Union appeared in public discourse. This term the public's faith in the Soviet system and eroded the social base of the Communist Children's Hospital Party, threatening the identity and integrity of the Union. Fray among the members of the Warsaw Pact nations and instability of its western allies, first indicated by the rise of Lech Wa''sa in 1980 under the command of the union Solidarity, accelerated, leaving the Soviet Union unable to rely on their...